Prepare to be captivated by a story that defies the boundaries of gender and time—a 17th-century woman in trousers who becomes a soldier, a farmer, a husband, and a father. But here’s where it gets controversial: is she a deceiver, a trailblazer, or both? Rose, directed by Markus Schleinzer, is a mesmerizing character study that challenges our understanding of identity and self-determination. Starring Sandra Hüller in a role that feels tailor-made for her, the film is a masterclass in subtlety, strength, and the quiet rebellion of a woman carving her own path in a world that offers her none.
Shot in stunning black and white, Rose is anything but a period romp. Despite its sensationalized opening—‘The true and twisted tale of a deceiver of land and folk’—the film is a sober, poignant exploration of a woman’s survival and self-realization. Hüller’s performance is a marvel of restraint and intensity, making it impossible to imagine anyone else in the role. Her portrayal of Rose is neither glorified nor sentimental, but it’s this very honesty that makes the character unforgettable.
And this is the part most people miss: Rose’s story isn’t just about gender bending; it’s about the lengths one will go to for freedom. ‘There’s more freedom in a pair of trousers,’ she declares, and in that simple statement lies the heart of the film. Rose’s deception isn’t a con—it’s a lifeline. By passing as a man, she gains access to opportunities denied to women: surviving war, owning land, and even starting a family. But is this triumph or tragedy? The film leaves that question open, inviting us to grapple with it long after the credits roll.
Hüller’s rise as an international talent is undeniable, with standout roles in Toni Erdmann, The Zone of Interest, and Anatomy of a Fall. Yet, Rose feels like a culmination of her abilities, a performance that’s both physically commanding and emotionally nuanced. Interestingly, Rose herself is a fictional character, an amalgamation of countless women throughout history who chose to live as men for survival, ambition, or love. This blend of fact and fiction gives the film a haunting authenticity.
The supporting cast, including Caro Braun as Rose’s wife, Suzanna, adds depth and humor to the narrative. Braun’s portrayal of a woman who evolves from a seemingly simple bride to a sharp-witted partner is a highlight, particularly in scenes where Suzanna discovers her husband’s secret. The film handles these moments with grace, avoiding farce while exploring the complexities of their relationship.
But here’s the bold question: Is Rose a hero or a fraud? Some might see her as a queer icon, while others might view her actions as deceitful. The film doesn’t take sides, instead focusing on her resilience and the societal constraints that forced her choices. The tragedy that unfolds in the final act is blistering, yet Rose’s unmasking feels like a quiet victory—a woman reclaiming her narrative in a world determined to silence her.
From Gerald Kerkletz’s striking cinematography to Olivier Meidinger’s meticulously crafted sets, Rose is a visual feast. The seamless blend of professional and non-professional actors further grounds the film in its historical setting, making the story feel both timeless and urgent.
As the film comments on patriarchal rules, male privilege, and the denial of women’s autonomy, it’s impossible not to draw parallels to today’s struggles. Rose isn’t just a period piece—it’s a mirror held up to our own society. And that’s what makes it so powerful. What do you think? Is Rose a revolutionary, a survivor, or something in between? Let’s discuss in the comments.
